CitySpin editorial policy
Read the research, fact-checking, sourcing, corrections, and update standards used throughout the CitySpin Knowledge Center.
Research process
Editors begin with the user question, review existing CitySpin workflows and primary sources, identify changing conditions, and separate verified facts from community experience.
Fact checking
- Check operational claims against current CitySpin workflows
- Prefer official documentation and first-party records
- Label limitations and changing conditions
- Remove unsupported statistics and universal claims
- Require a separate accuracy review before publication
Updates and corrections
Articles carry published and reviewed dates. High-change subjects are reviewed more frequently, while readers and staff can report an error through CitySpin support. Material corrections are made in the article and included in its next review record.
How sources are weighted
Sources are ranked before they are used. First-party CitySpin records and published operator documentation carry the most weight. Community posts and reviews are treated as signals of what players are experiencing, never as proof of what an operator did, because a review is an allegation rather than a verified record.
Commercial interest and its limits
CitySpin has a commercial interest in readers choosing CitySpin, and guides disclose that where it is relevant. That interest does not license overstating what CitySpin can do: pages say explicitly that CitySpin cannot inspect, verify, or act on an account created by another service, even when that limitation is inconvenient.